|
||||||||
| ||||||||
![]() |
Time in Palestine 04:37:33 Õ , 03/07/2009 | |||||||
|
PLO
Negotiations Affairs Department
Bad Fences Make Bad Neighbors - Part iiFocus on Qalqilya Fact Sheet: On April 15, 2002, Israel’s Prime Minister, Ariel Sharon
announced that he
will “isolate” Palestinians from Israelis by erecting “walls” and
“buffer zones” in a plan styled “unilateral separation.” The
strategy is to expropriate as much Palestinian land as possible while militarily
caging in as many Palestinians as possible, all in an attempt to continue
Israel’s colonization and occupation of Palestinian land and water resources.
At the same time, Israel will effectively isolate Palestinian population
centers from one another. One
of the cities most affected by this plan is Qalqilya where the wall highlights Israel’s increasingly visible apartheid
regime. For a map of the Qalqilya wall, visit Facts on Qalqilya
Facts
on The Qalqilya Wall On
August 15, 2002, the Sharon government announced its plans for the wall
surrounding Qalqilya:
Effect
of the Qalqilya Wall The
ultimate goal of erecting this wall is to confiscate and expropriate Palestinian
land as well as forcibly impoverishing the Qalqilya residents by denying them
means to a livelihood and access to natural resources. The Qalqilya wall
has little to do with security:
Given
that 45% of the city’s economy relies on agriculture, land and water
confiscation will coerce migration of Qalqilya’s residents eastward,
eventually making Israeli annexation of Qalqilya demographically
"acceptable". The Qalqilya Wall Violates
the Fourth Geneva Convention ·
The construction of the Qalqilya wall violates the Fourth
Geneva Convention’s prohibition of extensive destruction and expropriation of
property located in occupied territory not justified by military necessity.
Such destruction and expropriation constitutes a war crime. Any
destruction by the Occupying Power of real or personal property belonging
individually or collectively to private persons, or to the State, or to other
public authorities, or to social or co-operative organizations, is prohibited,
except where such destruction is rendered absolutely necessary by military
operations. (Fourth Geneva Convention, Article 53, in conjunction with
Article 147) Israel
has often claimed that its “security” mandates the violation of Palestinian
rights enshrined under the Fourth Geneva Convention. However, Israel’s
reliance on “security” as a means to circumvent the Convention does not
relate to the security of the occupying forces or to that of its
administration, but to that of the illegal settlers. “Military necessity”
cannot be invoked to defend violations of the Fourth Geneva Convention, such as
Israel’s implementation and maintenance of illegal Israeli colonies. To
turn violations into rights and consequently invoke the underlying principles of
the Fourth Geneva Convention, such as military necessity, to legitimize and even
defend the establishment and expansion of the violation is an affront to
international law in general as well as to the Fourth Geneva Convention in
particular. ·
The
Qalqilya wall violates the central obligation of the Occupying Power to
guarantee the well being and basic sustenance for the occupied civilian
population. It
is prohibited to attack, destroy, remove or render useless objects indispensable
to the survival of the civilian population, such as foodstuffs, agricultural
areas for the production of foodstuffs, crops, livestock, drinking water
installations and supplies and irrigation works, …whatever the motive, whether
in order to starve out civilians, to cause them to move
away, or for any other motive.
(Fourth
Geneva Convention, Protocol I, Article 54) The
extensive appropriation and destruction of land and property, especially fertile
agricultural land and water, deprives and effectively dispossesses the
Palestinian population of their basic sources of income and livelihood ·
The Qalqilya wall violates
the Fourth Geneva Convention’s prohibition of collective punishment.
No protected person may be punished for an offence he or she has not
personally committed.
Collective penalties and likewise all measures of intimidation or of
terrorism are prohibited.
(Fourth Geneva Convention, Article 33) The Qalqilya wall punishes the entire population of the city and therefore violates the Convention’s absolute prohibition of collective punishment. According to the authoritative Commentary of the Fourth Geneva Convention: “During past conflicts, the infliction of collective penalties has been intended to forestall breaches of the law rather than to repress them; in resorting to intimidatory measures to terrorize the population, the belligerents hoped to prevent hostile acts. Far from achieving the desired effect, however, such practices, by reason of their excessive severity and cruelty, kept alive and strengthened the spirit of resistance. They strike at guilty and innocent alike. They are opposed to all principles based on humanity and justice…”
The
High Contracting Parties undertake to respect and ensure respect for the
present Convention in all circumstances. (Fourth
Geneva Convention, Article 1) The
international community has failed to fulfill its obligation to enforce
international law, promoting Israeli intransigence by teaching Israel
that it may violate the law with impunity and reinforcing the sense of
abandonment prevalent in the Palestinian population. It is time that the
international community stop tacitly recognizing and accommodating continuing
Israeli violations which target an increasingly helpless civilian population. The Qalqilya Wall Violates
the Oslo Agreements:
Without derogating from Israel’s security powers and responsibilities
in accordance with this Agreement, movement of people, vehicles and goods in
the West Bank, between cities, towns, villages and refugee camps, will be free
and normal and shall not need to be effected through checkpoints or roadblocks.”
(Interim
Agreement, Annex I, Article IX, para 2(a))
Israel’s security powers, with respect to freedom of movement, extend
only to prohibiting or limiting the entry into Israel of persons and of vehicles
from the Occupied Palestinian Territories.
The Qalqilya wall affects Palestinian freedom of movement not only
into Israel, but also within the Occupied Palestinian Territories.
The
two sides view the West Bank and the Gaza Strip as a single territorial unit,
the integrity and status of which will be preserved during the interim
period. (Interim
Agreement, Chapter 2, Article XI) The Qalqilya wall will cut off Qalqilya from other Palestinian cities thereby destroying the territorial integrity of the West Bank
Neither
side shall initiate or take any step that will change the status of the West
Bank and the Gaza Strip pending the outcome of the permanent status
negotiations. (Interim Agreement, Chapter 5, Article XXXI) The
Qalqilya wall constitutes an Israeli unilateral action that changes the status
of the West Bank by de facto annexation of West Bank land on the western side of
the wall and by imposing a de facto border prior to the conclusion of permanent
status negotiations.
For
additional information on Qalqilya and the wall, please visit: http://electronicintifada.net/v2/article571.shtml (article) http://www.lawsociety.org/arjan/movies/qalqilyawall.mov
(video coverage) http://MondeDiplo.com/2002/11/05wall
(article) http://www.qalqilya.com (general
information)
|
![]() Home Page |